DHowett-MSFT added inline comments.
================ Comment at: test/Sema/ms-forceinline-on-variadic.cpp:1 +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm -o - -triple i686-windows -verify -fms-extensions %s \ +// RUN: | FileCheck %s ---------------- compnerd wrote: > Personally, I prefer the fully canonicalized triple name > `i686-unknown-windows-msvc`. I'll do this. ================ Comment at: test/Sema/ms-forceinline-on-variadic.cpp:14 + __builtin_va_end(ap); +} + ---------------- compnerd wrote: > Would be nice to have a second test that uses the Microsoft definitions > (`char *` and the offsetting handling for the `va_list` since when building > against the Windows SDK, that is the way that `va_list` and the `va_*` family > of functions will get handled. Should/do those still result in the intrinsic being emitted? If not, LLVM shouldn't have trouble during instruction scheduling, but inlining may still be broken. Regardless, though, this test exists only to make sure the function doesn't end up truly inlined, regardless of its contents. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D44646 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
