avt77 added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D44559#1045758, @rjmccall wrote:
> No, I still oppose this patch. OK, we have 2 possibilities here (fmpov): 1. Forget about the issue and don't do anything now - it is not a bug 2. Return the width based on real analyze of mul args: - signed vs. unsigned - chars, shorts, etc. What do you suggest to do? Or maybe there are other variants? https://reviews.llvm.org/D44559 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
