spatel added a comment. > The only question I have is whether its ok to emit the v2i32 intermediate > type for the 128-bit version. I wasn't sure of any examples where we use an > illegal type in our intrinsic/builtin handling. At least not a narrower type. > I know pavg uses a wider type.
I don't know of any precedence at this level, but we created illegal scalar int types (i128/i256) as part of memcmp expansion knowing that we'd match and combine those specific patterns in the DAG for x86. I figured that as long as we take responsibility for handling the illegal types, it's ok to do that...nobody has complained so far. :) Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D45421 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
