efriedma added a comment. The thing about the bool*-only version is that bool pointers are rare in C++, so I'm not sure we're gaining much. But if we can't do something more general, there's still some benefit.
I see your point about false positives for the more general version. I was sort of considering an attribute to allow implicit conversions to bool for a specific function (like an assertion), and then we could ban implicit conversions to bool for parameters to other functions. But that's probably overkill. https://reviews.llvm.org/D45601 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
