Charusso marked 14 inline comments as done. Charusso added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang-tidy/bugprone/NotNullTerminatedResultCheck.cpp:226 + DiagnosticBuilder &Diag) { + if (getLangOpts().CPlusPlus11) { + StringRef NewFuncName = (Name[0] != 'w') ? "strncpy_s" : "wcsncpy_s"; ---------------- aaron.ballman wrote: > What about C? The `else` part would fire. ================ Comment at: test/clang-tidy/bugprone-not-null-terminated-result-strlen-before-cxx11.cpp:11 +void bad_memcpy(char *dest, const char *src) { + memcpy(dest, src, strlen(src)); + // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: 'memcpy' function's result is not null-terminated [bugprone-not-null-terminated-result] ---------------- lebedev.ri wrote: > What about these functions, but in `std::` namespace? It is covered in `test/clang-tidy/bugprone-not-null-terminated-result-strlen-cxx11.cpp`, the test make sure my rename function doesn't touch the `std::` part. https://reviews.llvm.org/D45050 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits