rsmith added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D46190#1081773, @rsmith wrote:

> No, absolutely not. This would be insanely expensive, and marks entirely 
> unrelated things "used".


My apologies, reading this again it comes off a lot harsher than I'd intended.


Repository:
  rC Clang

https://reviews.llvm.org/D46190



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
  • [PATCH] D46190: F... Carlos Alberto Enciso via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D461... Carlos Alberto Enciso via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D461... Richard Smith - zygoloid via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D461... Richard Smith - zygoloid via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D461... Carlos Alberto Enciso via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D461... Carlos Alberto Enciso via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D461... Richard Smith - zygoloid via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D461... Carlos Alberto Enciso via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D461... Carlos Alberto Enciso via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D461... Carlos Alberto Enciso via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D461... Carlos Alberto Enciso via Phabricator via cfe-commits

Reply via email to