xazax.hun added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D46234#1082307, @rsmith wrote:
> Can you say something about why you want to track this? The original motivation was to fix this false positive in clang tidy: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46027 > Perhaps we should just use a null pointer for the not-instantiated arm of an > `if constexpr` instead, rather than tracking a flag on an empty statement > that is meaningless for real empty statements. I will look into that, thanks. I wonder if any of the code assumes that the than branch always present. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D46234 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
