lebedev.ri added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45931#1086665, @alexfh wrote:

> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45931#1084503, @lebedev.ri wrote:
>
> > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45931#1083192, @lebedev.ri wrote:
> >
> > > Thank you for looking at this.
> > >
> > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45931#1083184, @alexfh wrote:
> > >
> > > > From a user's perspective I'd probably prefer a different behavior of 
> > > > checks profiling with multiple translation units: per-file table after 
> > > > each file and an aggregate table at the end.
> > >
> > >
> > > Is this a review note, or a general observation?
> >
>
>
> Why not both? ;)


Review latency, finite time amount, you name it :)

>>>> An independent improvement could be to support TSV/CSV output and/or 
>>>> dumping to a file to spare the user from parsing the tables out of the 
>>>> stdout/stderr.
>>> 
>>> Yes, and a script to merge those CSV's, would be nice.
> 
> I'd probably go with a set of features enough for various use cases:
>  0. don't add any profile merging logic to clang-tidy
> 
> 1. dump profile after each TU to the screen in the current tabulated format
> 2. add a flag to specify a file name prefix to dump profile output for each 
> file as CSV
> 3. (optional) add a script to merge profiles from CSV files and dump as CSV 
> or tabulated (without a script this could be done in a spreadsheet)
> 
>   WDYT?




Repository:
  rC Clang

https://reviews.llvm.org/D45931



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to