lebedev.ri added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45766#1097736, @ksu.shadura wrote:
> Hi, Hi. > we see the false-positive behavior of -Wno-self-assign-overloaded flag in > case of subtraction assignment operator. > The minimal reproducer that we got: https://godbolt.org/g/8PQMpR > ... Could you please clarify, what is the false-positive? The fact that it fires on overloaded `-=` is intended behavior, and is tested in tests, see `cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/warn-self-assign-overloaded.cpp`: #ifndef DUMMY a *= a; a /= a; // expected-warning {{explicitly assigning}} a %= a; // expected-warning {{explicitly assigning}} a += a; a -= a; // expected-warning {{explicitly assigning}} a <<= a; a >>= a; a &= a; // expected-warning {{explicitly assigning}} a |= a; // expected-warning {{explicitly assigning}} a ^= a; // expected-warning {{explicitly assigning}} #endif > Thanks in advance! Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D45766 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
