thakis accepted this revision. thakis added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Looks great. ================ Comment at: docs/ReleaseNotes.rst:126 + namespace n { class C; } + using n::C; // Never actually used. + ---------------- Maybe include an example with a using directive and a namespace alias as well. ================ Comment at: docs/ReleaseNotes.rst:139 + used in conjunction with ``-Werror`` and as a result, the new warnings + are turned into new errors. + ---------------- nit: I'd omit this paragraph -- this is true for all warnings and not special for this warning. ================ Comment at: include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticGroups.td:828-829 // -Wunused-local-typedefs = -Wunused-local-typedef +def : DiagGroup<"unused-usings", [UnusedUsing]>; + // -Wunused-usings = -Wunused-using ---------------- CarlosAlbertoEnciso wrote: > lebedev.ri wrote: > > Why? gcc compatibility? > No particular reason. I just follow the 'unused-local-typedefs' model. > If there is not objection from others reviewers, I will drop the gcc > compatibility. Does gcc have a `-Wunused-usings`? As far as I can tell it doesn't, so I agree not having the alias makes sense. -Wunused-local-typedefs is here because gcc has that flag. https://reviews.llvm.org/D44826 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits