Quuxplusone added inline comments.
================
Comment at:
libcxx/test/std/containers/sequences/vector/vector.cons/construct_iter_iter_alloc.pass.cpp:60
+
+ void construct(pointer p, const value_type& val)
+ {
----------------
Per my comments on D48342, I think it would be fun to add a test allocator like
```
struct cpp03_fun_allocator : bare_allocator<T> {
...
void construct(pointer p, const value_type& val) {
construct(p, val, std::is_class<T>{});
}
void construct(pointer p, const value_type& val, std::true_type) {
::new(p) value_type(val);
}
void construct(pointer p, const value_type& val, std::false_type) {
::new(p) value_type(val);
}
```
and just see whether it passes the test suite. If it does, might as well add
that test. But if it doesn't, *I'm* not going to force anyone to fix it.
Allocators in C++03 seems like masochism to me. :)
https://reviews.llvm.org/D48753
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
