On Sep 30, 2007, at 3:19 AM, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
> -On [20070724 19:42], Steve Naroff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> On Jul 24, 2007, at 10:06 AM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>> This is a bug or missing feature in the declaration merging code.
>> Steve, can you take a look at this? Here's a self-contained
>> example:
>>
>> int array[10];
>> extern int array[];
>>
>> This is a missing feature that has a clear FIXME...
>>
>> /// FIXME: Need to carefully consider tentative definition rules
>> (C99 6.9.2p2).
>> /// For example, we incorrectly complain about i1, i4 from C99
>> 6.9.2p4.
>> ///
>> VarDecl *Sema::MergeVarDecl(VarDecl *New, Decl *OldD) {
>>
>> MergeTypedefDecl and MergeFunctionDecl are also incomplete. They
>> both have
>> TODO annotations...
>
> Any of you guys happen to have looked at it in the mean time?
Nope, not yet :(
-Chris
_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
