On Nov 30, 2007, at 3:01 AM, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote: > Annyeong haseyo Seo, > > -On [20071130 11:54], Sanghyeon Seo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> By the way, is cfe-dev correct list for sending patches like these, >> or >> do you prefer cfe-commits list? > > I think cfe-commits is solely intended for automated VCS commit > emails, so > cfe-dev should be correct. :)
In the clang world, just about everyone is subscribed to both lists, so it doesn't really matter :). In the llvm llvmdev and llvm-commits list, a lot more people are subscribed to llvmdev than -commits. The defacto behavior has been to have higher level discussions on the llvmdev list and detailed bug/ patch discussions on llvm-commits. That said, I read both list (well, all of them), so I don't personally care :) -Chris _______________________________________________ cfe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
