On Jan 30, 2008, at 8:57 AM, Nuno Lopes wrote: > Hi, > > Just a quick note to tell you that PCRE 7.6 (latest version) > compiles fine > with clang and the compiled binary passes the test suite as well. >
Great news! > --- > compiler | compile+link time | test suite run time | binary size > gcc 4.1 | 17s | 1.9s | 43KB > clang+llvm | 1m 13s | 1.4s | 188KB > --- > > Although llvm is much slower at compiling (the linking part seems to > be > really slow due to the -O2 optimizations), the binary produced is much > faster :) > This doesn't makes sense to me. Are you using an optimized "release" version of clang? If so, can you compile/measure with -fsyntax-only? > > Congratulations to everybody ;) > Ditto. Chris and I couldn't be happier with the way this community has pulled together. snaroff > Nuno > > P.S.: PHP still doesn't compile :S > P.S.2.: why isn't LLVM deployed to replace gcc? isn't it capable to > act as a > drop-in replacement for gcc with the gcc front-end (for now)? > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev _______________________________________________ cfe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
