This was likely caused by r46557 (Eli, do you agree?).
Since the error appears to be correct, I changed the test case. There
are other "expected" errors in this test case that don't appear
consistent with GCC.
snaroff
On Jan 30, 2008, at 1:23 PM, Ted Kremenek wrote:
I'm now seeing the following regression in 'make test':
******************** TEST 'Sema/conditional-expr.c' FAILED!
********************
Command:
clang -fsyntax-only -verify -pedantic Sema/conditional-expr.c
Output:
Errors seen but not expected:
Line 6: incomplete type 'void' is not assignable
The offending line:
*(0 ? (double *)0 : (int *)(void *)0) = 0; // expected-warning
{{pointer type mismatch ('double *' and 'int *')}}
and the unexpected warning:
conditional-expr.c:6:41: error: incomplete type 'void' is not
assignable
*(0 ? (double *)0 : (int *)(void *)0) = 0; // expected-warning
{{pointer type mismatch ('double *' and 'int *')}}
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
Did someone forget to update this test, or is this a regression? It
looks like a regression to me, since the l-value on the left side of
the assignment is not of type void.
_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
_______________________________________________
cfe-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
