On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 5:25 AM, Neil Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Eli Friedman wrote:- > See http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/dr_017.html, > part 14. Intent seems to be to give implementations license to reject.
Yeah... section J.2 says "A storage-class specifier or type qualifier modifies the keyword void as a function parameter type list (6.7.5.3)." is undefined behavior. That said, there's nothing in the referred-to section that actually makes it illegal. So I'd still like to try and get some clarification. -Eli _______________________________________________ cfe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
