On Mar 10, 2008, at 9:53 AM, Shantonu Sen wrote: > I'm not sure if it's more strict, or the libstdc++ headers have > changed, or what, but the following errors occur:
I think that they did a cleanup of the libstdc++ headers to make them #include less. I agree with you that the clang source should include hte headers it needs, not relying on an artifact of the libstdc++ implementation. > ... > GRSimpleVals.cpp:33: error: explicit template specialization cannot > have a storage class > GRSimpleVals.cpp:55: error: explicit template specialization cannot > have a storage class > ... > > Attached is a patch for all but the GRSimpleVals.cpp issue. Removing > "static" fixes it, but I'm not really sure what the error is really > trying to convey. I think your patch is right, thanks. > For the other cases, the source files do indeed use those functions > without explicitly including <string.h> or <iostream>, and it seems > bad to rely on side effects of other headers, even if it used to > work before. I applied both changes. The only change I made was to turn <string.h> -> <cstring>, which is the functionally equivalent but more C++'y version of the header. http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20080310/004642.html http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20080310/004643.html Thanks Shantonu! -Chris _______________________________________________ cfe-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
