I want to know if my following thought is correct: The default include paths have priority over the -I<path>. On the other hand, -L<path> has priority over default lib paths. Am I right?
I'm asking this because I read the following doc: https://libcxx.llvm.org/docs/UsingLibcxx.html which has the following advice: -------------------- Pasting ------------------------------------------------------------- If you want to select an alternate installation of libc++ you can use the following options. $ clang++ -std=c++11 -stdlib=libc++ -nostdinc++ \ -I<libcxx-install-prefix>/include/c++/v1 \ -L<libcxx-install-prefix>/lib \ -Wl,-rpath,<libcxx-install-prefix>/lib \ test.cpp -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- As you can see he puts the option: -nostdinc++ because (I think) the "default include path" has priority over the I<path>. At same time, there is not a similar option there to remove "default lib path"s so that make me think that the L<path> has priority over "default lib path". _______________________________________________ cfe-users mailing list cfe-users@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-users
