Hi Maarten, I am not a windows user and never build with mingw in my life. :)
Did you try out building a release-version of LLVM first? Sometimes there are breaking changes committed that e.g. linux-users will not notice on their system. Our Buildbots have to catch up first before the issue is then fixed (http://lab.llvm.org:8011/console) I myself did build LLVM with gcc-8 when it got released, which worked. But I didnt retry since then. Best, Jonas Am 11.11.18 um 21:53 schrieb Maarten Verhage via cfe-users: > Dear LLVM/clang people, > > I’m new to LLVM. I used TDM-GCC toolchain with gcc version 5.1.0 before but > I want to move on getting LLVM and Clang to work on my system: Windows 7 > 64bit. > > I would like to go for a MinGW64 toolchain to build the newest version of > LLVM and clang. > > I downloaded MinGW-W64 GCC-8.1.0 from here: > https://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Toolchains%20targetting%20Win32/Personal%20Builds/mingw-builds/8.1.0/threads-posix/ > > There I selected the x86_64-posix-seh version believing that would be the > best one. I got llvm and clang plus the llvm libc++ standard library as > suggested on the getting started webpage. > > I put the mingw-w64 bin folder in my PATH. > gcc -dumpversion > shown 8.1.0 > > In the llvm build folder I did: > cmake -G "MinGW Makefiles" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release .. > that completed succesfully > > mingw32-make -f Makefile > > It builds to 57%, then a bunch of errors: > 1) > C:\dev\llvm\projects\libcxx\src\support\win32\thread_win32.cpp:156:8: error: > 'InitOnceExecuteOnce' was not declared in this scope > 2) > C:\dev\llvm\projects\libcxx\src\support\win32\thread_win32.cpp:163:6: error: > redefinition of 'bool > std::__1::__libcpp_thread_id_equal(std::__1::__libcpp_thread_id, > std::__1::__libcpp_thread_id)' > 3) And a couple of more errors all in thread_win32.cpp. > > So I think it would have been better to select the Mingw-w64 > x86_64-win32-seh or even x86_64-win32-sjlj version instead? > > Is a recent Mingw-w64 toolchain version like 8.1.0 a good one to build > llvm/clang? Or would an older one be more stable? > > Thanks anyway for any suggestions. > Best regards, > Maarten Verhage > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-users mailing list > cfe-users@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-users _______________________________________________ cfe-users mailing list cfe-users@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-users
