On 12/19/05, Luís Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If this is what you mean, I disagree. I think the behaviour here > should be uniform since ideally users would test a set of CFFI > bindings on one implementation and be confident that it would work on > the other supported lisps.
PMFJI, but as a CFFI user I agree with Luís on this. I personally would still test on each implementation, but non-uniform behavior from CFFI would violate the principle of least surprise because I am expecting CFFI to smooth over differences like this. -- Jack _______________________________________________ cffi-devel mailing list cffi-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel
