>Agreed. Still, the ability to call varargs functions seems to be
>useful. Namely, James is working on an Objective-C bridge on top of
>CFFI that uses this functionality.
Are you sure that is varargs or do you mean polymorphism, i.e. each different
signature has a different entry point (address), but they are still refered
under an identical name?
That remembers me with the stdcall calling convention & name decoration on
MS-Windows, where there are two versions of the gd.dll: one with typical C
names, another with things like "@8" appended, when there are 8 bytes worth of
arguments.
Regards,
Jörg Höhle.
_______________________________________________
cffi-devel mailing list
cffi-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel
