We wound up changing the names of all the forms, removing the def- prefix. This keeps them similar enough to the CFFI names that there's still mnemonic value - my original thinking was that there's no good reason to force users to memorize more names.

Yeah, sb-grovel compatibility was never a goal; changing the interface is definitely always an option. We're still undecided on the best way to handle object names.

-- Dan Knapp

_______________________________________________
cffi-devel mailing list
cffi-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel

Reply via email to