Keith Irwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So, does this mean we can't save a core with CFFI in it? I know > there are other ways I can simulate a standalone executable, but I > was just wondering if we users should just take for granted we can't > build a new core file (with sbcl, anyway), or is this just an > ongoing problem yet to be fixed?
This is due to a known bug in SBCL that (I believe) will be fixed in the next release. As a temporary workaround, you can run PURIFY before loading code that creates callbacks. See: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.steel-bank.devel/6185 James _______________________________________________ cffi-devel mailing list cffi-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel
