On 2006-jan-09, at 11:11, Hoehle, Joerg-Cyril wrote:
Luis Oliveira wrote:
* Pushing cffi-features symbols to *features*
- Renamed :cffi/no-foreign-funcall and :cffi/no-long-long to
cffi-features:foreign-funcall and cffi-features:long-long
respectively
(with the opposite meanings of course).
I find this unfortunate. While there are guidelines against the use
of negation (and the likely use of double negation), I'd prefer not
to clober *features* on full-featured implementations. Therefore, #
+|- NO-foobar made a lot of sense.
It's name embodied that something was not as nice as it could be.
That's lost now.
That was indeed my initial idea. James, what do you think?
--
Luís Oliveira
http://student.dei.uc.pt/~lmoliv/
Equipa Portuguesa do Translation Project
http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/translation/registry.cgi?team=pt
_______________________________________________
cffi-devel mailing list
cffi-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel
