"Hoehle, Joerg-Cyril" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Map cffi:long-long to ffi:sint64 and ffi:uint64. I have not added > an ffi:long-long type. Not ideal, but good enough. > > I've now updated CVS CLISP to support interfacing to a 64bit "long > long" entity on all platforms where some 64bit type is available > (e.g. gcc, MS-VC). > > In other words, cffi-features:no-long-long should be removed from > cffi-clisp (or you may wish to conditionalize on the version number > or whatever, but that's too restrictive since e.g. I'm convinced > that ffi:uint64 has always worked on 64bit machines, where long=long > long)). > > Please test & report if it fails.
Hmm, I've tried to install an x86 CLISP in a 32-bit chroot to prepare to implement and test this, but I'm a little concerned about the fact that MACHINE-TYPE still returns X86-64 on a 32-bit x86 build. Is there a better way to tell whether we are running an x86 or x86-64 CLISP? James _______________________________________________ cffi-devel mailing list cffi-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel
