On 2/11/06, Luís Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Cool, thanks. An alternative would be to actually signal an error > explaining that the DLL is outdated instead of just failing one > test. What do you think?
Yep, I agree that's better. Updated patch attached. -- Jack Unrue
libtest-version-check-v2.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ cffi-devel mailing list cffi-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel
