On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 17:11 +0100, Luís Oliveira wrote: > Stephen Compall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > http://scompall.nocandysw.com/cffi/etfd-opt3.darcs.patch > > http://scompall.nocandysw.com/cffi/etfd-opt1.darcs.patch > > Many thanks for producing patches for both options! I'm inclined towards > option 1 and IIUC you are inclined towards option 3
Great! I actually prefer option 1 as well. -- Stephen Compall http://scompall.nocandysw.com/blog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ cffi-devel mailing list cffi-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel
