On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 23:27 +0100, Luís Oliveira wrote:
> > Also you are forcing people to install a version of RT which is
> > basically the one with ECL, though ours output more useful
> > information, such as the message of a condition when the output is
> > one.
> 
> Good point. James, do you remember why we've resisted to use other
> versions of RT so far? :-)

I'm fine with using ECL's version of RT if it's advertised as a public
interface for general use.  IIRC, the SBCL maintainers preferred to
reserve the right to change SB-RT incompatibly, as its really intended
for testing of contribs, not for user code.

James


_______________________________________________
cffi-devel mailing list
cffi-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel

Reply via email to