James Bielman <jamesjb <at> gmail.com> writes: > > What's the use case for this?
Short answer: `g_object_new'. I'm trying to (re)write some simple GTK+ bindings which are going to focus more on generating bindings via GObject's reflection/introspection-features than going through the "parse C headers"-path. > Down with varargs! Yeah, same with C-macros. Thanks for the tip. The caching-idea might work. I'd only need to cache for properties that are flagged `G_PARAM_CONSTRUCT_ONLY'. If I'm not able to figure something out there I'll have to dive into `g_object_newv' which seem(ed) way more complicated that `g_object_new'. :) -- mvh, Lars Rune Nøstdal http://nostdal.org/ _______________________________________________ cffi-devel mailing list cffi-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel
