"Jack Unrue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > (cffi:defctype rect-pointer :pointer)
(define-foreign-type rect-pointer-type () () (:actual-type :pointer) (:simple-parser rect-pointer)) > (defmethod cffi:free-translated-object (ptr (name (eql 'rect-pointer)) param) > (declare (ignore param)) > (cffi:foreign-free ptr)) Now RECT-POINTER-TYPE is actually a CLOS class. So you should use a normal specializer instead of an EQL specializer. (defmethod free-translate-object (ptr (type rect-pointer-type) param) ...) > Can anyone make suggestions as to what I should change to be compatible > with the cffi-newtypes branch? That's basically it. Change the type definition and change EQL specializers to normal specializers. I've compiled the cffi-newtypes manual and uploaded it here: <http://common-lisp.net/~loliveira/tmp/cffi-newtypes/> The section about foreign types should be updated. (Not all of the reference nodes are though, I think.) Now's a good time to object to this new interface and propose changes. I'm all ears. :-) I sent some ideas a few weeks ago, but I don't really have clean solutions. They can be read here: <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cffi.devel/1033> > Second question -- do the WITH-FOREIGN-SLOTS and WITH-FOREIGN-OBJECT > macros work the same way on cffi-newtypes as they did before? I imagine so, > but it's worth asking just to be sure. No changes there. -- Luís Oliveira http://student.dei.uc.pt/~lmoliv/ _______________________________________________ cffi-devel mailing list cffi-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel
