Hi,
>Juho Snellman recently[1] posted a very useful SBCL-specific coverage
>tool.
> <http://common-lisp.net/~loliveira/tmp/cffi-tests-coverage/>
>The results seem pretty good to me: 80.5% code coverage.
This is inded an excellent result given that presumably no tool was ever used
before as a guide to achieve a good coverage, i.e. tests were written on an
ad-hoc basis. Jumping from 0 to 80 at the first attempt is excellent.
You don't say what these percentages express, so it's pointless to compare that
number to other numbers reported in the software reliability community.
Congratulations,
Jörg Höhle.
_______________________________________________
cffi-devel mailing list
cffi-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel
