On 01/09/07, Rayiner Hashem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That said, we shouldn't really be using defctype* at all, right? > Slightly more clever processing of definitions should obviate any need > for it.
Forgot to reply to this bit. So, we could make DEFCTYPE behave like DEFCTYPE*, i.e. defer the type instantiation until parse-time. IIRC, the only disadvantage is that you don't get an immediate error on (defctype foo some-typo-here). -- Luís Oliveira http://student.dei.uc.pt/~lmoliv/ _______________________________________________ cffi-devel mailing list cffi-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel
