"Luís Oliveira" <luis...@gmail.com> writes: > 2009/1/13 John Fremlin <j...@msi.co.jp>: >> It is just the without-scheduling bit that I need . . . > > So, perhaps we could start by adding a new > CFFI-SYS:WITHOUT-USERSPACE-SCHEDULING macro. (And perhaps > CFFI-SYS:ERRNO and (SETF CFFI-SYS:ERRNO) as well.) Would that be a > step in the right direction? Not sure if this is the right thing to > do.
Ideally there would be a way to use the def-foreign-call errno collection in Allegro CL via CFFI. For example, if the foreign-function is trace'd then the without-interrupts mechanism (sporadically) fails. Although it is simple to make a cffi-sys:errno symbol-macro, I think that logically the errno is only valid immediately after a foreign-function call. The idea that GC must not modify errno must be false on at least a few implementations ;-) We should not pretend that it is possible to get errno at an arbitrary point after a foreign function call. _______________________________________________ cffi-devel mailing list cffi-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel
