> How about making CFFI:FOREIGN-ALLOC always return a null pointer > regardless of what malloc() would do? Would that work? Yes; this is fine with me. I was just thinking one could prevent testing for :count 0 by allowing the same return value as malloc() and thus not introduce an overhead.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cffi-devel mailing list cffi-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel
