Having reflected on it for a few minutes, it seems absurd generating all those branches to different union members that ultimately return the same pointer (except perhaps in the most paranoid interpretations of the C language). I've attached what I think is a saner implementation.
On 7/1/09, Andy Hefner <ahef...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here's a darcs patch to add support for every reasonable specialized > array type in ECL: ([un]signed-byte [8,16,32,64]), single-float, > double-float, bit, base-char, character. > >
simpler-ecl-element-types
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ cffi-devel mailing list cffi-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel
