On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 17:27 +0100, Luís Oliveira wrote: > On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Attila Lendvai<attila.lend...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> :wrapper libraries are those auto-generated by cffi-grovel, > > > > could their name contain the word "grovel" in any way? my english is > > lacking for this, but it would be much more intuitive than :wrapper... > > Another idea would be that cffi-grovel subclasses cffi:foreign-library > and do something with that. Not sure if it's overkill, though.
I tried that too, but ATM it's useless: I got to the point where I had the classes foreign-library, system-library and wrapper-library but only foreign-library needed initialization(after refactoring, the other two classes had empty initialize-instance methods). The difference between :system and :wrapper libraries is only intentional, not factual. -- Stelian Ionescu a.k.a. fe[nl]ix Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur. http://common-lisp.net/project/iolib
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ cffi-devel mailing list cffi-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel
