On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Hans Hübner <hans.hueb...@gmail.com> wrote: > I use an automated mechanism to setup my asdf:*central-registry* and > it would be a pain if I had to change that. I find it offensive if > some library decides that it is "better" than something else and makes > that something else unusable or harder to use.
Good thing there was never any such intention, otherwise you would be offended! I'm sorry uffi-compat is not useful for you, I guess... > In my own private copy cffi, I have renamed CFFI"s uffi.asd to > uffi-compat.asd. I'd recommend that this'd be done in the upstream > version, too. uffi.asd was added by popular demand. (Or maybe it was just *one* user, I don't recall.) I'd be glad to rename it, but as I've mentioned in a previous email, I'm worried that it'd do more harm than good. Suggestions on how to solve the problem are most welcome. -- Luís Oliveira http://student.dei.uc.pt/~lmoliv/ _______________________________________________ cffi-devel mailing list cffi-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel
