On Sep 9, 2009, at 12:38 AM, Johan Ur Riise wrote:
> This is the lisp-name function
>
> Even if the system here is conformant with the documentation, it would
> not hurt to allow the last two forms. I suggest to change the first
> test
> from (keywordp (second spec))
> to (oddp (length spec))
I'm not sure it was a good idea to allow both ("c-name" lisp-name) and
(lisp-name "c-name"). I'm more inclined to deprecate the latter than
add yet another special case.
--
Luís Oliveira
http://student.dei.uc.pt/~lmoliv/
_______________________________________________
cffi-devel mailing list
cffi-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel
