Faré <fah...@gmail.com> writes: > The changes could conceivably be contained in a single file, though > unhappily not with the current version of XCVB. Also, it makes things > noticeably harder for the Make backend if the meaning of a file > depends on data in a central file shared by all - basically, you can't > let Make rely on timestamps anymore, and/or you must rebuild > everything when the central file changes. Which is one of the > annoyances of ASDF.
Well, the problem that I personally see is that you urge maintainers to maintain inter-file dependencies in two different places for each file involved. I thought that you provided an asdf-compatibility mode where you parse the .asd file to obtain the dependency information from. Is that not the case? -T. _______________________________________________ cffi-devel mailing list cffi-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel
