> I am trying to simplify ASDF-Install'ing Cells-GTK on different > platforms. When trying with ECL, I find the following problem: CFFI > defines uffi-compat package with "uffi" alias. Comment even expresses > doubt whether it is a good idea. ECL has its own UFFI. So CFFI should > either not declare such nickname for ECL or remove the alias from "FFI" > package. I think the second is a better (although marginally more > complex) behavior, because it increases portability and reduces number > of people who notice implementation quirks of UFFI package.
Why load cffi's uffi-compat if ECL has its own UFFI? I don't see the increase in portability. - Daniel _______________________________________________ cffi-devel mailing list cffi-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel
