On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Luís Oliveira <luis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll > <juanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > Actually it would be nice if instead of a compiler macro I could define > them > > to be just plain macros. Anything that prevents it? > > It might work for this particular case, but I'd prefer compiler > macros. See DEFINE-MEM-ACCESSORS in cffi-sbcl.lisp for an example. > The problem with compiler macros is that they may stop working depending on the optimization settings. Also it is not clear to me from the definitions whether %mem-set returns a value, or whether I can simply produce a form that does not return anything. Juanjo -- Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain) http://tream.dreamhosters.com
_______________________________________________ cffi-devel mailing list cffi-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel
