On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 5:53 PM, nitralime <nitral...@googlemail.com> wrote: > +------>-| typedef wchar_t ZAB_CHAR; | > | | typedef wchar_t ZAB_UC; |
> | Unicode |------+------>-| typedef char16_t ZAB_CHAR; | > +---------+ | | typedef char16_t ZAB_UC; | > +------>-| typedef unsigned short ZAB_CHAR; | > | typedef unsigned short ZAB_UC; | > The question is now: Is it correct (resp. safe) > to defctype ZAB_UC just as :uint16 and interpret > it as a UFT-16 code point (with an appropriate endiannness)? Maybe. Which typedef applies? This might be a job for cffi-grovel. > How can the types like wchar_t and char_16_t be defined (resp. used) in > CFFI? I'm not sure. You'll have to figure out whether those types are equivalent to (un)signed short on your platform. Again, cffi-grovel might help. -- Luís Oliveira http://r42.eu/~luis/ _______________________________________________ cffi-devel mailing list cffi-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel
