2011/10/23 Victor <bob...@ua.fm>:
> But the functions from FF package are a little bit different than the
> functions from CFFI. They look like more similar to the UFFI but still
> are not the same.
>
> Did anybody face a similar problem already? What is the best way to
> refactor the ACL wrappers to be portable across implementations?

I've never used SWIG myself, can you contact the maintainer of its
CFFI-generator? Regarding porting your ACL bindings to CFFI, you can
definitely do it function by function incrementaly if there aren't too
many of them.

Cheers,

-- 
Luís Oliveira
http://r42.eu/~luis/

_______________________________________________
cffi-devel mailing list
cffi-devel@common-lisp.net
http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel

Reply via email to