On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 4:13 AM, Stelian Ionescu <sione...@cddr.org> wrote: > Xach requested better error reporting from load-foreign-library, so > please review this patch
So now we consistently get a load-foreign-library-error instead of getting a simple-error for some of the errors. Storing the pathname in the error seems like a good idea too. Is there a specific use-case that motivated that change? I'm asking because it's not populated correctly in the try-foreign-library-alternatives case, and it's not clear what should go there in that case. Perhaps we should store something else? (The foreign-library object perhaps?) -- Luís Oliveira http://r42.eu/~luis/ _______________________________________________ cffi-devel mailing list cffi-devel@common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel
