Stas Boukarev <stass...@gmail.com> writes: > Stelian Ionescu <sione...@cddr.org> writes: > >> On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 14:46 +0000, Stas Boukarev wrote: >>> Luís Oliveira <luismbo <at> gmail.com> writes: >>> >>> > >>> > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Stelian Ionescu <sionescu <at> cddr.org> >>> wrote: >>> > > (with-foreign-object (p '(:struct timespec) 2) >>> > > (mem-aref p '(:struct timespec) 1)) >>> > > >>> > > In order not to break existing code [...] >>> > >>> > Existing code will not have this (:struct foo) syntax because it was >>> > introduced by the libffi merge. (mem-aref p 'timespec 1) should >>> > exhibit backwards-compatible behaviour. >>> Turns out, the problem is not with mem-aref, but with the mem-aref compile- >>> macro. It binds *parse-bare-structs-as-pointers* to T, whereas mem-aref >>> function >>> doesn't, this affects the result of foreign-type-size. >> >> Actually it's mem-aref that should bind *parse-bare-structs-as-pointers* >> to T, so I pushed the fix > > This breaks it. And the same problem with *parse-bare-structs-as-pointers* being different is also present in the setf macro for mem-aref.
-- With best regards, Stas. _______________________________________________ cffi-devel mailing list cffi-devel@common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel
