On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Luís Oliveira <luis...@gmail.com> wrote: > Did you notice the function lisp-string-to-foreign? Seems like a > cleaner way to implement translate-into-foreign-memory.
More importantly, how can you be translating a string without performing allocation in this case? Also, in general, translate-into-foreign-memory for strings should definitely refuse to accept string types without an explicit size. (Which is not implemented yet, IIRC.) In any case, why does Ryan's example need translate-into-foreign-memory? -- Luís Oliveira http://r42.eu/~luis/ _______________________________________________ cffi-devel mailing list cffi-devel@common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel