>> Did you define a method on component-depends-on, so that >> process-op will depend on the load-op? >> >> Something like that might do: >> >> (defmethod component-depends-on ((o process-op) (c grovel-file)) >> `((load-op ,@(component-load-dependencies c)) >> ,@(call-next-method))) >> >> You might even skip the call-next-method. > > No I had not. Adding this method solves the problem that Luis encountered. I > have attached a new patch incorporating this method. Thank you for your help. > Note that I've just fixed a long-standing bug in ASDF 2.26.9, whereby in older versions of ASDF this will cause excessive recompilation, and would have to instead use component-do-first (which I have just removed). Don't be alarmed if you see too much recompilation (but tell me, I like my hypotheses confirmed) — and instead upgrade to ASDF 2.26.9, or ASDF 2.27 when it's out later this month.
—♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org If mice were the ultimate input device, humans would be born with one arm and three fingers. _______________________________________________ cffi-devel mailing list cffi-devel@common-lisp.net http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel
