On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 4:33 AM, Chris Bagley <chris.bag...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I ran into similar issues to Willem and have taken to using the following > macro: > > (defmacro with-foreign-slots* ((vars ptr type) &body body) > "Create local symbol macros for each var in VARS to reference > foreign slots in PTR of TYPE. Similar to WITH-SLOTS. > Each var can be of the form: slot-name - in which case slot-name will > be bound to the value of the slot or: (:pointer slot-name) - in which > case slot-name will be bound to the pointer to that slot." > (let ((ptr-var (gensym "PTR"))) > `(let ((,ptr-var ,ptr)) > (symbol-macrolet > ,(loop :for var :in vars :collect > (if (listp var) > (if (eq (first var) :pointer) > `(,(second var) (foreign-slot-pointer > ,ptr-var ',type ',(second var))) > (error "Malformed var names must be:~%name~% -or- > ~%(:pointer name)")) > `(,var (foreign-slot-value > ,ptr-var ',type ',var)))) > ,@body)))) > > This, for me, balances the needs quite nicely and feels in line with the > style of cffi. Thoughts or modifications? > I had thought about doing something like this when looking into Willem's problems. I like it, but I think the "*" in the name is unnecessary. It is upwardly compatible with the current with-foreign-slots, isn't it? That is, if it were to replace with-foreign-slots, it would expand correctly for current usage (to values). I think we should replace that macro with this. Liam
