On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Stelian Ionescu <sione...@cddr.org> wrote: >> I think the current committed behaviour works nicely for use case #1. >> Use case #2, which you've raised, suggests that ignoring a missing >> pkg-config is a bad default. What about adding making it an option? > > That's fine, but the strict mode should be the default.
Agreed. >> Also, if we're going to cater to use case #2, then perhaps we should >> support a list of alternatives à la define-foreign-library. What do >> you think? > > I think we should wait until somebody actually asks, because that can > also be a source of compilation errors. Sounds reasonable. >> Finally, how about renaming the directive to pkg-config-cflags? (I can >> sort of imagine we might want a pkg-config-lfags for wrappers at some >> point in the future.) > > That's a good idea. [...] Pushed a commit implementing what we've discussed. Thanks for your input Stelian. Cheers, -- Luís Oliveira http://kerno.org/~luis/ _______________________________________________ Cffi-devel mailing list Cffi-devel@common-lisp.net http://mailman.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cffi-devel
