> On 3/3/16 Mar 3 -9:18 AM, Zach Beane wrote: > > Luís Oliveira <luis...@gmail.com> writes: > > > >> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Zach Beane <x...@xach.com> wrote: > >>> Nothing related to the code, but I found that a couple projects will not > >>> build because they specify versioned dependencies on CFFI, and master > >>> does not have a version in its system definition. > >> > >> That's unfortunate. Is there some static thing I can place in the > >> version property that means "this is bleeding edge"? > > > > I don't know of an option for that. I'd guess using some higher version > > number with a distinguishing suffix might help? ASDF is a stickler about > > its version formatting. > > > > Zach > > > > I fear that will not do what you want: > > > (asdf:version-satisfies "3.1.2.rc" "3.1.2") > NIL > > The RC there for some reason is breaking the match: > > R> (asdf:version-satisfies "3.1.2" "3.1.2") > T
asdf:version-satisfies expects only numbers, which sounds pretty reasonable to me. S> (asdf:version-satisfies "3.1.2.990" "3.1.2") T -- Stelian Ionescu a.k.a. fe[nl]ix Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
